Workflow maps reviewed
The supplied workflow maps were technically reviewed. Platform fit and proposed AI use cases remained under assessment.
Assessment in progress. The process pack needed clarification before a rebuild, and neither the replacement platform nor the AI use cases had been approved as a completed deployment.
Make matter progress the test
Discovery and staff input made the movement of matters through the practice a central criterion. NewLaw reviewed the supplied workflow maps and examined how that work might be supported in a replacement platform.
The review identified information still needed before the maps could serve as a build specification, including timing rules, current versions and references requiring clarification.
Keep AI claims tied to a task
The wider assessment included proposed uses such as chronology work, file naming and moving document information into matter fields. Those uses still needed to be proved.
The project update brought the workflow review, platform options and remaining questions together. It gave the next round of testing a more specific brief, while keeping the final platform decision open.
The practical lesson
Use the way matters actually progress as the test. A product demonstration is more useful when it must answer a defined workflow question.